ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 2570
Jul 17 06 2:04 PM
Posts: 9117
Jul 17 06 2:12 PM
Posts: 155
Jul 17 06 7:30 PM
Jul 17 06 10:12 PM
Posts: 2274
Jul 18 06 6:38 AM
Quote:Our way was to indicate threats, not non-threats... you know like real life. But we have adopted to IDPA, and for the most part are better off for it.
Jul 18 06 8:19 AM
Jul 18 06 8:54 AM
Quote: For example, I was told a recent state match defined the threat indicators on a target WERE HARD COVER!
Jul 18 06 9:14 AM
Quote:As far as a level playing field for moving no-shoots, we already have the level playing field issue with respect to lefties, 6, 7,8,9,10, and 11 round capacities, etc.
Jul 18 06 9:38 AM
Jul 18 06 6:02 PM
Posts: 80
Jul 19 06 6:04 AM
Jul 19 06 7:01 AM
Quote:I personally like the hands. If I ever had to deal with an aggressor, most of my focus would be on what was in his hands. Wouldn't want to draw down on an angry drunk guy for waving a cell phone at me.Perry
Jul 19 06 7:04 AM
Quote:We "t-shirt" all our threats on Leagues sometimes even on club shoots, what happened is that our shooters started becoming used to a "t" being a threat and a painted cardboard target being no-shoots!
Posts: 2264
Jul 19 06 7:53 AM
Jul 19 06 2:27 PM
Jul 19 06 4:05 PM
Quote:...much like Ted did 2 years ago with that big rifle out of the helecopter. It's defined. It's warned. It RANG when you hit it.
Posts: 5459
Jul 20 06 8:32 PM
Posts: 106
Jul 21 06 8:39 AM
Quote: the threat indicators on a target WERE HARD COVER!
Posts: 726
Jul 21 06 4:40 PM
Jul 24 06 6:54 AM
Quote: I don't care what the indicators are as long as they are clearly explained in the walk through.
Share This