ForgotPassword?
Sign Up
Search this Topic:
Forum Jump
Posts: 167
Aug 7 12 10:37 PM
freeidaho wrote:Howdy, Below is a quick summary of the comments that were made in this thread. When someone doesn't get their way it must be a conspiracy. One guy that wasn't even trying to get into the Nats was stirring the pot for some reason. Not one person responding was willing to give HQ the benefit of the doubt. Not one person called HQ to find out. Odd. Ken Reed --Do all shooters in match have required minimum points? Not mine --Big mystery - who knows?!?!? Also not mine --I did not get in to the nationals and I have 9 points. I have friends who got in with 3, 7 and 8 points. Mine and its a damn good question --How can someone get in with 3 or 4 points and someone with 9 not goes with the above. --Personally I would like to understand how anyone with 3 points made it, when I have 4 points. Well, I do want to understand... --The secrecy of information not being released leads me to believe points are not determining factor for entry Kind of what I said and it seems I was correct there was the unpublished cut off after all... --but I am not polite in real life, why do I need to be polite here Me again and I still think that. I am who I am love of or to hell with you --If the announced system didn't work as intended... or didn't work at all... maybe it should be fixed and clarified. Exactly!!! --I like the idea of actually using whatever system the choose. What a concept... It would have worked except for the missing link! --I suspect there is no way you are correct on this..... direct response to you for the comment you made that made it sound like you had some secret informationWhat was your problem with all of this?
Share This