Bob
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
kimberguy2004 |
|||
|
Hopefully the SOs will use the PE as a teaching tool, but the only way I see that occuring is if the SO takes time after the COF to explain that a penalty was
assessed and exactly why. I wouldn't have a problem with it being handled like that and I don't see why anyone else would either. Just do it right
then. Otherwise it's like swatting the dog two days after he pees on the carpet..
Bob
Iraq needs a Constitution. Lets give them ours. It was written by some pretty smart guys, and it's worked very well for 213 years, but as of Black Tuesday,
we won't be using it any longer.
|
|||
drewbing |
|||
|
Ken,
What exactly is your definition of an "outlaw club"? I have no problem with a pistol club that is affiliated with IDPA running a match that they upfront say "this is NOT an IDPA match" But then uses some or most of the IDPA rules in order to keep simplicity and clarity on what the purpose of a particular match is. The example here is a Hi cap match. Where all other IDPA rules would apply except division capacity. Matches like this can be fun and interesting to explore what things would be like if this rule or another were different, and how it changes the dynamics of a stage. I DO have a problem with a club that steals the IDPA rulebook, IS NOT affiliated with IDPA, and does not require membership in IDPA. Running matches that are "IDPA like". I'd probably have an even bigger problem with a club that just blanket uses the IDPA rulebook but is not affiliated. Drew Bingaman
|
|||
freeidaho |
|||
|
Drew,
Standby because for the first time since you joined the IDPAForum, we are going to agree. Outlaw to me is a club that is not affiliated but uses most of the IDPA intellectual property, the IDPA rules, and does not write their own rulebook. They just use IDPA's rulebook with the exception of a few rules. Popular ones to ignore are magazine capacities, holster rules, and using cover for all reloads, etc. Of course one of the side affects of this is that they do not require their shooters to be IDPA members, which further takes money from IDPA. Recall in the beginning that it was not easy for IDPA. There were more nay-sayers than their were supporters. They have worked long and hard on that problem, and put their money at risk to do so. They should reap the rewards of this hard work and risk. As an example, I live within a days drive of an outlaw club, run by the nicest guy and best shooter you would ever want to meet, and someone I have a ton of respect for. Some of their shooters come to our state match and we are vary glad to have them, they are a fun and hard working group and know how to have a great time where ever they are. But we SOs have had to explain some of the rules of IDPA to these shooters and they sometimes will not believe they are real rules. One older guy with a very nice Red Corvette made the trip to our state IDPA match several times. He was just sure he could wear shorts and knee pads for example. I think he left the match mad because he could not do that in our state match, and I was as sweet about it as one could be. (See Bubba's rules of escalation.) Groups like TSA and IDSA have actually written their own rulebook, and although they are very similar to IDPA, they are different. It is not a cut and paste, it is a ground up new rulebook with different phrasing and some different rules. (You should read their rulebook if you are so inclined, it is a pretty darned good effort.) I have no heartburn over these clubs. They put in the time and effort to make their sport flurish, and should enjoy the fruits of their labor. It is in effect a whole new sport. Some of them even have multi-gun rules. I also have no heartburn over Frank Glover's famous saying which paraphrased says, "I put on at least 6 IDPA matches a year as required, and this isn't one of them." So this is just one man's opinion from the vacuum of Idaho, and holds no weight outside my own head. Food for thought as it were.... Have a good day, Ken Reed Edited to add that the MD of the outlaw club above actually started it as an IDPA club long ago, and would make it an IDPA club again, but the BoD or members won't have it for some reason. This MD is my friend, and one of the biggest IDPA supporters that I know. I clearly mean no disrespect to him and his continued efforts to get this club affiliated again, and it was used in my post purely to aid the discussion.
Last Edited By: freeidaho
01/14/09 13:27:21.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
katos dad |
Contradiction | ||
|
For all the great American constitutionalists out there advocating for "Freedom of Choice", "No Restrictions on Individual/Group Freedoms"
and Adam Smith's "Laissez Faire Economics"...what is this?
Since when is IDPA a 'not for profit' organization? Just try and get something free from them. They developed a modified activity (IPSC/USPSA preceded them), that is subject to anyone else's interpretation, modification, or partial use of their "guidelines" for their own use. Imitation is the greatest form of flattery. As long as they call it "IDPA like", there is no problem. Free Enterprise, Isn't that the Great American Way? Why not stop Burger King from selling hamburgers, didn't they copy McDonald's "like concepts"? "a Jim Martin like" signature A13643 |
|||
Bexar Dave |
|||
|
It has been my observation at the four clubs where I shoot that participants generally come in two flavors. There are those who consider themselves competitors
and those that come to shoot, have a good time and take advantage of the opportunity to practice their gun handling and such. I am not counting the new folks
that show up at every match.
I should mention that all the clubs are IDPA sanctioned clubs and all follow the rule book religiously. Now, here comes the big HOWEVER... Those shooters that come to compete are run through each course of fire observing the rule book. PEs are assessed, cover is called, no reloads in the open and harassment happens when brain farts occur, scores are kept and bragging rights are strictly observed. Sometimes, people get upset because of call that doesn't go their way...it happens and everyone goes home, no blood was spilled. Then there are the other shooters, they want to shoot and PEs and such just don't bother them. These folks may not load behind cover or move when they should or a whole bunch of other sins of omission or commission, it just doesn't matter to them, they are there to do their thing and they are happy. And, none of the competitive group has a whole lot of heartburn over it, everyone is happy. Personally, I think there is room for both types of shooters at the same match and in the same club. Now the rookies are a different animal all together. I think that is the obligation of everyone in the IDPA community to help the new folks get a good grounding in what our sport is all about. Everyone, MDs, SOs, scorekeepers, range nazis, vendors, range owners, grounds keepers, parking attendants and the local police; we should all be doing our dead level best to insure that the new, interested shooters that show up at a match have the opportunity to learn about how the IDPA game is played and how much fun we have playing the game. Where I shoot, the SO with the rookie on his/her squad uses the inevitable oops that would be a PE not as a penalty, but as a teaching moment. And, while that is happening, the experienced shooters are back behind the line coaching the other new folks and helping them get a good handle on how to play our game. We make sure that the new folks feel welcome and that we want them to come back. Do we have a couple of range nazis that are just looking for a reason to give a PE? Well, yes we do! But we manage, we make fun of them, both to their face and behind their backs, we are equal opportunity harassers. It should be noted that the range nazi has a place in the sport. I like to shoot on their squad just before a big match figuring that if I can shoot clean on their squad then I should be okay at a major. Be that as it may, we try to keep the rookies away from them until they have a good grounding in the game and are ready to shoot with the big boys and girls. Gotta go back to work now...later.
Dave Wallace
Member in Good Standing Merry Band of Agitators |
|||
Jane |
|||
katos dad wrote:If they prominently called them "McDonalds-like" in their advertising, you bet they'd hear from lawyers. And I double-dare anybody to call something "Microsoft-like" in an ad....
Jane - Expert on nothing with opinions on everything...
|
|||
katos dad |
HUH? | ||
|
BRILLIANT james |
|||
Jane |
|||
katos dad wrote: And incontrovertible
Jane - Expert on nothing with opinions on everything...
|
|||